Re: Fire Type Gym

by **Shadow01192** Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:07 am

I heard about it through Serebii chat. However I've yet to see an exact list so I choose those. I know it's close to whatever the exact list is because from what I've always seen its the t-tar, garchomp, dragonite, salamence, Metagross and two completely random ones. If you find out where it started and or what the list is great I'll change it to be the actual list until then like I said I like it.

by **y0l3itches** Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:18 am

Why are u telling people they can't use certain pokemon... I don't think that should be added as a rule... Only thing I can advise is no garchomp and no wobbuffet if you say no ubers... But I think thats as far as I go... Please change the rule and just say no Ubers including garchomp and wobb...

by **Shadow01192** Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:21 am

It doesnt say you cant use them. It says that you cant use more than one of those pokemon. Im sorry Im not changing it unless Admin herself says its wrong in which case Alex has to change his rules as well. And Garchomp isn't Uber, if it is where are you getting this information?

by **y0l3itches** Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:32 am

And the rule of 7 is something you made up, but at least garchomp there is info backin it up thats its uber... Uber is a term people used to evaluate pokemon, which means people made it... Did nintendo make a list of pokemon that say mewtwo or darkrai is ubers, no its the people... You can't make a fake list of pokemon people can't use, otherwise, everyone is going to pick 7 pokemon on there list so nobody can win... I would pick 7 ice types that would kill my dragon team and as long as they pick 1 out of the 7, I know i can win 100 percent of the time. Now tell me, thats call cheating, you can't make up a rule of 7 rule to get 7 pokemon you don't like out of the battle...

by **Shadow01192** Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:38 am

If wanted to get pokemon I don't like i would have picked milotic and blastoise as well don't you think? Stop being so imbecilic, I was told about it an adopted it I like it if you've got a problem with it then tell admin if she finds that my rule is overstepping my boundaries fine. Then I will change it and not before.

by **y0l3itches** Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:40 am

She left me ant and alex in charge. How bout if ant says something also, or even alex so its a 2/3 then your rule drops... Admin is takin a break from the forums thats why she let us be in charge. If you got a problem with that, you can drop your title now, otherwise try and change the minds of Ant and Alex when they get on the chatbox.

by **Shadow01192** Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:42 am

Alex uses the rule of 7 and ant already said my rules were fine. You were on when he agreed to them.

by **y0l3itches** Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:45 am

You 2 have fukin different rules of 7, fuck this shit, im gonna make a rule of 7 and pick 7 fukin pokemon... Then nobody can beat me, thats a load of bullshit...

by **Shadow01192** Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:48 am

Ok explain to me how you find the rule so outstanding that i can't lose? You can still use garchomp just not with dragonite, or any of the other 6. Is that such a problem for a great battler like yourself? If you can explain how the rule I'm using is so great then I will remove it. But i can't see what your complaining about. And why have you waited to complain till now, why didn't you say something to alex?

by **y0l3itches** Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:54 am

I just fukin found out, i just left a message at alex post just now. Didn't you just see it? If i knew about this bullshit rule I would have brought it up... I know you guys can only use 1 fukin type but im at the same disadvantage with only dragons, and I win most of my battles. i don't see a problem so whats up with the rule, if anything ill pick up 7 different pokemon that the opponent can't use against me also and it would do so much better... Btw garchomp and salamence take next to 0 damage from fire attacks, it would be good if u can get rid of those 2 dragons since they don't take much from fire attacks and deal earthquake. Just a bunch of bullshit you guys made up, ill bring it up with alex tomorrow so don't worry your little head.

by **Shadow01192** Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:57 am

Only problem is i have my magmortar and torkoal with HP Ice to take out dragons. But I don't see why it matters to a battler of your caliber. I mean you have 4 teams to take out anyone you want. It can't be such a problem

by **DiamondBreeder** Sat Sep 20, 2008 1:39 am

never trade before battle, it makes you less trustworthy because you could look at people's attacks

by **rok27** Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:13 am

hey shadow can we have the leader ship battle

by **Shadow01192** Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:00 am

I thought you were quitting these forums rok. . .If you say so Diamond, I couldn't decide so i just wrote that one. I'll edit that one

by **Shadow01192** Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:49 am

I decided to take out the rule of 7 for a few reasons. One is half of me was keeping it just to aggravate Y0l. I'm sorry man but its fun. Another is after talking with y0l and searching a few forums that a tournament organizer in the area said he checked for the rule of seven, and I found some people talking about something like it but i never did find it so I addressed this to him and he decided to take it out and after battling I realized however annoying seeing dragonite, metagross, tyranitar, salamence, all in a row is I guess some people enjoy that team. Thanx y0l for looking for it, I know if you had found it you would have said it. Another reason is people can't seem to understand the rule and I'm tired of explaining it. So thats about it. Ehh Have fun guy and Happy Halloween

by **HEDGE X** Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:15 pm

badge battle plz Very Happy

by dakota44123 Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:51 pm

HEDGE X wrote:badge battle plz

i need help

by **steel tyrant** Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:59 pm

dakota is that you in you avatar and whats wrong

by dakota44123 Sat Oct 11, 2008 5:58 am

steel tyrant wrote:dakota is that you in you avatar and whats wrong

i dont no how toplay this game

by **steel tyrant** Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:21 am

well do you have diamond or pearl? if you do then this should be pretty easy

by **Shadow01192** Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:11 am

Sure hedge. I'll try to be on Saturday around 1 o clock pm CST. If you have a sort of schedule where you get on PM me and tell me when so i can try to meet you.

by **HEDGE X** Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:42 pm

im english
basically the sites time is only 1 hour ahead of my time
so try and figure out the time diffrence

by **@Hitz Ownage** Sat Oct 18, 2008 5:18 am

I'll chalenge you in a battle, 1 on 1 ... My Infernape vs Your ?

by **Shadow01192** Sat Oct 18, 2008 7:43 am

I just finished a new Infernape so yea actually I could use to test it.

by **Shadow01192** Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:36 pm

Ok I realize I never posted gym Challenge rules only Badge Challenge rules. So I'm going to repost them here and Introduce my first trainer Raul Crager.

Badge Battles will be one of 4 battles chosen at random when the challenge is made via the poketch roulette ap. Either Single Battle 3 vs 3, Single Battle 6 vs 6 or Double Battle 4 vs 4 Double Battle 6 vs 6. A Challenger may request a certain type of battle.
Gym Battles Will be Single Battle 6 vs 6.
There Will be a time limit on all battles of 15 minutes. Whomever is ahead after 15 minutes is the victor. This rule may be ignored.
Double Item and Double pokemon clause.
No Legendaries, Ubers, or hacks. (smogon uber list)
Evasion Clause
Sleep Clause
Self KO Clause
Leader and Challenger must trade after. For a Gym battle both players may only have fire type pokemon on their party.
All Players must be good sports and try to have fun.
A challenger who has broken the rules has had their challenge accepted and has lost.
Any player wanting to challenge me must battle my trainer first, refusal to do so is considered breaking the rules. (if i don't have a trainer or if my trainer doesn't respond to you within 5 days my trainer will have been considered to having lost the match and we will battle)
That was longer than I wanted it to be.

by Sponsored content